The versatile nature of plastics
means that they have become a ubiquitous element of our modern everyday
existence in various forms.
However, aside from the benefits
plastic provides for society the rapid increase in production and disposal over
the last 60 years needs to be curbed due to the various negative impacts it
holds for the environment.
Plastics are organic in nature,
produced from natural resources such as crude oil and natural gas and thus
responsible for GHG emissions with the combustion and processing of fossil
fuels. However the environmental impacts of plastic isn’t limited to their
contribution to climate change.
You’ve seen Happy Feet right?
Remember this guy?
Lovelace, from Happy Feet (2006) |
This is Lovelace, the love guru of
the penguin world.
Notice the can-rings around his
neck? That’s the result of plastic pollution on the marine ecosystem, a growing
area of concern for ocean researchers such as Fendall
and Sewell (2009) as it ‘affects
at least 267 marine species by ingestion or entanglement’.
Marine pollution of plastic bag - ingestion by turtle |
Once processed, plastic continues
its path of environmental damage and destruction. As a non-biodegradable
material, plastics have a long life and thus a large ‘killing capacity’
when it comes to both the marine and terrestrial environment (Planet Ark, 2012).
A
plastic product that has received much attention in recent years is ‘7% of wind borne
litter escaping from landfills’, the plastic bag (Planet Ark, 2012). Which since its emergence
in the 1960s has become a fundamental member of daily life.
Today there is a general consensus
that ‘plastic
bags are becoming a victim of their success’ and a global effort has been
launched to rid society of the ‘culture of the bag’
we’ve become accustomed to (Roach,
2003)(BBC, 2015).
However, changing consumer habits
associated with shopping since the 1960s will be a tricky task.
Are the general public up for the
challenge? Or will decades of habit prevail?
Let me introduce you to this
statistic featured in the BBC
News (2015):
‘In
2006 the Environment Agency calculated the 82 bags required to carry the
average person's monthly shop would produce as much carbon dioxide as
travelling five miles by car.’
That’s the power of plastic - or should I say problem?
The environmental issues associated with plastic bags |
Alerting the public of the
environmental damage caused by our plastic bag greed is one way to generate
reflexive changes in our consumption habits, however Fogg
(2014) has voiced concern over the effectiveness of environmental
awareness, stating: ‘One of the more depressing
truths for anyone with green leanings is that awareness of problems does not in
itself change behaviour’.
So what next?
A familiar feature of various news
media has been the implementation of the 5p plastic bag charge in England last
month to encourage the purchase of re-useable bags – bringing the problem of
plastic directly into the domestic arena (Howell,
2015).
This approach applies the logic
that "When there
is an economic disincentive involved, consumers tend not to use a product" (BBC,
2015).
However, although money is generally the language that (unfortunately) speaks
loudest to society, it has been argued that 5p is ‘not a punitive amount’ and that it ‘merely acts to pay off
one’s conscience, and is not a long-term solution’(BBC,
2015)(Fogg,
2014).
So if we can’t motivate society to
change their consumer habits through education or economic punishment, then
what can we do?
Check out this blog post: http://www.momscleanairforce.org/whats-plastic-got-to-do-with-clean-air/. Aside from the GHGs emitted when
plastic is produced, this blog raises awareness of the health implications
created by our demand and over-reliance on these handy plastic products.
Have you ever wondered what the
secret recipe for a plastic bag is?
Ever marvelled at how soft,
flexible, yet enduring they are?
Well my friend, this is due to
clever chemicals that go by the name of “Phthalates”. However these chemicals
have an alter ego which they are keeping secret from you. They are also
endocrine disruptors which are ‘associated with a whole host of healthproblems’ including:
- · lower testosterone levels
- · decreased sperm counts & poor sperm quality in males
- · obesity
- · reduced female fertility
- · preterm birth & low birth weight
- · worsening of allergy & asthma symptoms
- · behaviour changes
Of course I’m not suggesting that
any of you ingest plastic bags, but you know that “new car” smell? That’s the
smell of the phthalates “off-gassing” and migrating into the air we breathe
because they are ‘not chemically bound’ to our plastic bags.
I don’t know about you, but this
horrified me.
So perhaps, if environmental issues and 5p
charges aren’t enough to make you change your shopping habits, then maybe we
need to start speaking to the egoistic sides of humanity and make the problems
of plastic personal.
Hi Caitlin! A very interesting blog-post! The impacts of plastic on marine species is truly devastating. The scary thing is, there is such a large amount of plastic in the oceans, that they are as large as a small island and it is constantly increasing. So many marine species die everyday due to an accumulation of plastic in their system. I really do hope that human awareness increases on this topic!
ReplyDeleteHi Maria, thank you for your comment! I agree, it's a scary thought that I don't think is made real enough to society. I hope so too!
DeleteSomething I found during my research this summer is that regardless of whether or not you provide the environmental benefits or risks to an environmental issue (energy consumption, plastics, etc), economic benefit and impact is the only thing that will motivate majority of people. It's sad, but understandable to some extent - so hopefully the 5p bag charge will motivate some shoppers to be more sustainable in their bag usage!
ReplyDeleteHi Louis, thank you for your comment! I apologise for my very slow response!
DeleteI agree, it's a sad reality but one I guess we have to use to our advantage? If economic incentives are the only way to generate stewardship and care for the environment then I suppose it's the best option we've got? I hope so to!
Thank you again for your comment!
Hi Caitlin, thanks for directing me to this interesting post! I find the topic of motivating society to care about and take action on plastic pollution and over-consumption a largely depressing one. As you mentioned, knowledge of the environmental impacts is not always enough to make people care. Unfortunately economic incentives have to be resorted to, and, my personal favourite, re-framing the environmental issues in a way that makes it clear just how detrimental the effects to humans will be. I find that sometimes the only way to get through to people about environmental issues is to remind them that they rely on the environment for LITERALLY EVERYTHING, like the air they breath and the food they eat, and that an unhealthy environment will equal an unhealthy population! Although I am by no means a proponent of economic incentives for nature conservation, in this case I do support the 5p plastic bag charge - I agree, the amount does seem trivial, but hopefully it will make a change. Do you think that humans have it in them to do the right thing by the environment or that the only way to make people care about plastic pollution is to call on their own sense of self-preservation, focusing on issues like food and health?
ReplyDeleteHi Lucy, you're welcome!
DeleteYes, I agree - if only it was as simple as education and awareness!
Yes I don't think that message is stressed seriously enough - we have so many adverts for wateraid, starvation etc however there is no advertisement of the underlying issue that is global environmental and climate change!
I think that - unfortunately - wider society often can't be bothered to break the mold of their habitual lives and that we must highlight the very personal aspects of the issue i.e. food and health like you say, in order for them to act! People don't do things for free unfortunately, so direct impacts such as economic and health must be utilized to incentive change. That's my personal view anyway...
Thanks Lucy :)